This argues against evolutionary theory by highlighting the perceived inexplicable complexity of certain organisms, such as the Jack-in-the-Pulpit and the dragonfly. The author, William J. Tinkle, contends that the intricate structures and life cycles of these organisms defy explanation by the gradual, incremental changes proposed by Darwinian evolution. He emphasizes that the theory fails to account for features lacking immediate "selfish advantage," like the plant's striking form and color, and the dragonfly's dramatic metamorphosis. Ultimately, the piece advocates for a creationist worldview, asserting that the diversity and beauty of nature are better explained by purposeful creation rather than random evolutionary processes. The article bolsters its argument with extensive citations of both creationist and evolutionary texts, framing the debate as an irreconcilable conflict between two fundamentally different perspectives on the origin and nature of life.