To take advantage of innovations in statistical baraminology methods, we re-evaluated the baraminology of hominins using two character sets from Berger et al. (2010) and from Dembo et al. (2016) as modified by Wood (2020a). Traditional distance correlation methods and cluster analysis by medoid partitioning and fuzzy analysis were applied to each character set. Our results revealed a robust cluster of putatively human taxa that was observed in almost every analysis. This cluster included the contentious taxa Homo naledi and Australopithecus sediba, but the status of Homo floresiensis was unresolved. Our results reinforce previous studies using only baraminic distance correlation and multidimensional scaling.