In a recent paper, O'Micks analyzed the cranial and postcranial characters for six hominin taxa and concluded that the recently discovered Homo naledi was "probably not part of the human holobaramin." Consideration of postcranial characters is desirable in baraminology; however, previous studies of hominins have shown that reducing the taxon sample size can result in spurious baraminic distance correlations not seen in larger taxon samples. Re-analysis of O'Micks' character sets show that the lack of baraminic distance correlations is likely the result of a small taxon sample. Therefore, excluding Homo naledi from the human holobaramin is an unwarranted conclusion from O'Micks' results.