Years ago, I found myself embroiled in a heated editorial controversy, which I felt very strongly threatened the integrity of creationist publishing. These many years later, the details of our dispute seem much less important, but I can viscerally recall how angry I was when my objections were ignored. After losing that fight, I wrote a paper arguing for the Christian basis of double-blind peer review, the form in which the author and reviewers are unknown to each other. I sent it around to a few others who agreed with my perspective, and they suggested modifications and agreed to join as co-authors. We published it in the inaugural volume of Answers Research Journal. Google Scholar tells me it has been cited once, which is perhaps more than it deserves.