The taxon Homo habilis has recently re-entered the evolutionary scenario of human origin. It has, unfortunately, been also entered into the scenario of some creationists. The evidence is poor, fragmentary, uncertain and fraught with controversy. Evolutionists assign the material to Homo because they think it evolved into Homo, not because of what the creature looked like. Creationists should not accept such a taxonomic assignment without first analyzing the evidence and the taxonomic philosophies of evolution. In reality, the small-brained, primitive creature looks like an australopithecine.