There was Evening — and There was Morning

Korthals, Richard G. (1965) There was Evening — and There was Morning. Creation Research Society Quarterly, 2 (2): 2.

[thumbnail of There was Evening — and There was Morning.pdf]
Preview
PDF
There was Evening — and There was Morning.pdf

Download (50kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article explores the differences between scientific and religious views of creation, particularly focusing on the theory of evolution and the literal interpretation of the Genesis creation account. The author explains that while science, through its reliance on reason, senses, and observable data, is forced to adopt the theory of evolution, a literal interpretation of Genesis requires faith in God's revelation. The author questions the assumptions and interpretations made by scientists regarding the age of the earth and the origin of life, highlighting the role of uniformitarianism in these theories. The article emphasizes the importance of teaching both evolution and creation in schools, presenting the weaknesses of evolutionary theory alongside its strengths. The author concludes by reaffirming his belief in a literal six-day creation and the truth of biblical miracles, emphasizing the importance of faith in God's control amidst scientific challenges

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy (General) > BU Creation, Evolution, and Society > BU4 Education and Outreach
B Philosophy (General) > BB The Bible > BB2 Interpretation of Genesis
Depositing User: Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2025 01:14
Last Modified: 12 Mar 2025 01:14
URI: https://crsq.creationresearch.org/id/eprint/1666

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item