Neo-Darwinism and Society

Moore, John N. (1966) Neo-Darwinism and Society. Creation Research Society Quarterly, 2 (4): 2.

[thumbnail of Neo-Darwinism and Society.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Neo-Darwinism and Society.pdf

Download (65kB) | Preview

Abstract

The article "Neo-Darwinism and Society" by John N. Moore explores the profound impact of neo-Darwinian evolutionary thought on Western society, particularly its role in promoting a materialistic worldview and shaping social and political ideologies. Moore argues that the widespread acceptance of evolution as fact has been used by some intellectuals to indoctrinate society with a purely naturalistic explanation of human origins and behavior. The article traces the historical development of materialistic philosophy, highlighting the influence of figures like Charles Darwin and Karl Marx, whose ideas contributed to the rejection of a divinely created order and the elevation of human reason and empirical observation as the ultimate sources of knowledge. This shift in worldview has led to significant consequences in various fields: 1)History: Economic determinism, popularized by historians like Charles A. Beard, interprets historical events primarily through the lens of economic forces, downplaying the role of individual agency and moral values. 2) Economics: Marx and Engels embraced Darwin's ideas to support their theory of class struggle, viewing societal evolution as driven by economic competition and the survival of the fittest in the economic realm. 3) Social Studies and Literature: Evolutionary ideas permeated literature and social sciences, with authors like Jack London and George Bernard Shaw using their works to promote socialist ideologies grounded in a materialistic understanding of human nature. Moore criticizes the presentation of evolution as an undeniable fact, asserting that it remains a theoretical framework with significant limitations. He draws on scientific arguments, such as the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record and the improbability of spontaneous generation, to challenge the validity of neo-Darwinian claims. He concludes by emphasizing the need to re-evaluate the societal implications of embracing a purely materialistic worldview based on evolutionary theory. The article echoes themes discussed in our previous conversation, particularly the concept of baramins and the limitations of natural selection, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding the role of evolution in understanding both the natural world and human society.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy (General) > BU Creation, Evolution, and Society
B Philosophy (General) > BD Speculative Philosophy
Depositing User: Admin
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2025 01:14
Last Modified: 12 Mar 2025 01:14
URI: https://crsq.creationresearch.org/id/eprint/1673

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item