An article with the same title as that used here, appeared a few months ago in a well known magazine, and received considerable attention. The point in it was that Darwin's notion of survival of the fittest was tautologous. Here the author points out that the fact that it has been possible for such an article to be published is no reason for creationists to become complacent. Moreover, it is pointed out, that there are available to creationists better lines of attack than to urge tautology. For Darwin's theory requires that there be something to be selected, that variations which amount to new species or kinds arise. But the evidence shows that nothing of the sort occurs.