CRS Quarterly Research Database

Cellular Origins and the Three "Primary Kingdoms": A Critique

Anderson, Kevin L. (1980) Cellular Origins and the Three "Primary Kingdoms": A Critique. Creation Research Society Quarterly, 16 (4): 2.

[thumbnail of Cellular Origins and the Three "Primary Kingdoms": A Critique.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Cellular Origins and the Three "Primary Kingdoms": A Critique.pdf

Download (644kB) | Preview

Abstract

By use of two-dimensional electrophoresis of a cell’s rRNA a ‘fingerprint’ of the cell can be produced. This "fingerprint" indicates the existance of a large difference between what has been termed "prokaryote" and "eukaryote". In fact, some select groups of organisms thought to be prokaryote are no more prokaryote than eukaryote. Thus three "primary kingdoms" have been proposed by evolutionists for these basic cell types. Such a strong difference in the reproduction system of these three cell types indicates that any evolutionary history would have to be at a simple level with an extremely early divergence. As a result of this, the evolutionary model for the cell must consist of three coexisting paths rather than the classical single pathway. In view of this a creation model would appear to fit more precisely with available data.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science (General) > QH Natural History. Biology > QH573 Cell Biology
Q Science (General) > QH Natural History. Biology > QH359 Biological Evolution
Q Science (General) > QR Microbiology
Depositing User: Admin
Date Deposited: 18 Mar 2025 21:41
Last Modified: 18 Mar 2025 21:41
URI: https://crsq.creationresearch.org/id/eprint/460

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item