Access the full text at the publisher's website
Jeanson, Nathaniel T. (2018) No Replacement of Darwin—Reply 2. Answers Research Journal, 11: 19. pp. 275-299. ISSN 1937-9056
Abstract
I'm again grateful to Frello, this time for the length and detail of his follow-up review. In this second critique, Frello begins to concede some of the major points of Replacing Darwin. In addition, Frello is unable to mount a scientific challenge to the remaining theses. This is helpful progress in our discussion, and it argues for the strength of the science in Replacing Darwin.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science (General) > QH Natural History. Biology > QH359 Biological Evolution > QH359.1 Charles Darwin Q Science (General) > QH Natural History. Biology > QH426 Genetics Q Science (General) > QH Natural History. Biology > QH102 Baraminology. Biosystematics |
| Depositing User: | Admin |
| Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2026 23:44 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Sep 2026 23:44 |
| URI: | https://crsq.creationresearch.org/id/eprint/1720 |
Actions (login required)
- View Item